Why Photo Mechanic > Lightroom…
Lightroom 2 is an amazing tool! However, Military Photographers as well as AP and Reuters Photojournalists need more metadata POWER!!! Why doesn’t Lightroom’s metadata tools have what it takes to replace Photo Mechanic? Well, put this in perspective. It is required for us to fill out 17 IPTC metadata fields quickly and efficiently in order to submit our photographs to the Pentagon and National Archives for historical record. See below for Department of Defense required metadata fields:

If we fail to properly and accurately fill in all this metadata, our pictures lose historical record. As a result, IPTC metadata is worth 50% of our image and usually determines if it will be published or not. Moreover, it identifies who took the photo along with a detailed description of what was going on so we can track the image over hundreds of years. If you are not feeling the pain of adding metadata to your images in Lightroom then you are probably not adding metadata to your images in the first place…
So what is Lightroom missing? Well it’s actually quite simple. There are 5 things I would LOVE to see in Lightroom so I don’t have to open up Photo Mechanic ever again.
1. FIND AND REPLACE
Lets say I captioned 200 photos and accidentally typed soldiers instead of Soldiers. Well instead of going back one by one fixing every last mistake, all I need to do is conduct a simple find and replace on selected or all photos. Moreover, I can select which IPTC fields I want to find and replace:

2. STATIONARY PAD
Yes, Lightroom has Metadata Presets that are pretty powerful. However, these presets are not as user friendly as those seen in Photo Mechanic’s layout. If Lightroom simply added some buttons to the bottom of their dialogue box that allowed you to apply your Metadata Preset (Stationary Pad) to selected images then their process would be so much easier to use. Moreover, the ability to customize your metadata presets so only the fields you want to see pop up (exactly like you can do with the Metadata Viewer Preset Builder in the metadata panel as well as renaming your IPTC lists to exactly the way you’d like would greatly enhance Lightroom’s workflow!
Lightroom is limited in its Metadata Preset Features:

Photo Mechanic does a much better job with an easy to use dialogue box called the IPTC Stationary Pad:

3. SPELL CHECK
So Lightroom on the Mac does in fact have Spell Check (sorry Windows users but honestly you aren’t missing out on much) but it isn’t using its own native Spell Check. It is using the OS and is extremely unreliable. Moreover, it has this horrible buggy auto-detect feature that tries to replace entire sentences at a time? Come on now Lightroom, even Text Edit can do spell check…
Lightroom isn’t detecting any errors in this caption:

Photo Mechanic sees them all and even underlines them. WOW!!! This is high tech stuff

4. POP-UP WINDOW TO ENTER IPTC METADATA
Photo Mechanic has an amazing pop-up window that allows you to FOCUS in on your captions. Like I said earlier, metadata makes up 50% of our photos. We all know Lightroom has an AWESOME develop module that allows you to focus in on image editing. Why doesn’t Lightroom have something similar to their develop module for caption writing that quickly allows you to go through your images with no other distractions using a nice, clean, big pop-up window to see just what you want to edit?
Photo Mechanic allows you to focus on caption writing:

LR Metadata is an afterthought! It’s hidden off to the side & you can’t even view all the fields at one time…

5. VARIABLES
Now this is a VERY powerful feature of Photo Mechanic that Lightroom doesn’t support. Variables allow you to place any code into an IPTC field so it automatically updates based on EXIF, IPTC, and my favorite – FILENAME! As a result, I can plug our VIRIN (filename) into the VIRIN IPTC field automatically by typing {filenamebase} This saves lots of time and lets your customize all your metadata exactly like you want!
Hundreds of custom variable can be entered in Photo Mechanic:

CONCLUSION
Lightroom 2 is an incredible tool and it has changed the way photographers process their work! However, there are too many limitations for Lightroom to completely replace Photo Mechanic in our workflow. This is such a shame because nothing is more annoying than dragging files from Lightroom into Photo Mechanic to edit the captions then saving the metadata back to the images and finally reading the metadata back into Lightroom… It’s a horrible experience and often involves errors and lost metadata. I guess there is a reason why Photo Mechanic is still the industry standard for the majority of Photojournalists… Hopefully Adobe will listen and fix up these limitations!
As always, please let me know if you have any questions, comments, or concerns!
-Tyler
“To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift.” -Steve Prefontaine
Comments
Trackbacks
- Photo News Today » Blog Archive » Why Photo Mechanic > Lightroom… - Tyler Ginter
- Pages tagged "mechanic"
- FastStone Image Viewer - Digital Photography Tips and Techniques





r. stevens March 22nd
fortunately, lua is a really easy scripting language (or so it seems at first glance). i’ll see if i can write some plugins over the next couple weeks.
Eric March 23rd
Tyler, thanks for posting this. I’ve forwarded this along to my colleagues on the Lightroom team.
Earl March 23rd
Comment to Eric…. As an early beta tester of Lightroom 1 and a constant comment contributor in LR 2, I focused my attention on metadata and keywording issues with little if any results. I find this extremely frustrating since Adobe’s approach to LR was to obtain user input from the community yet it chose to either ignore input on this topic, thought they had a better way or had higher priorities. This input included personal meetings with staff.
I hope they finally get the message on this topic.
Thanks for the post
Mike March 24th
Whoa, really a great post. Very insightful into the world of photography and archiving. I’ve always enjoyed military photos in particular and seeing this process was incredible. I hope you keep up the great work and hopefully your requests to light room will be added as legit features. It’s so frustrating when a great program won’t do “simple” stuff. But really, great post and I’m looking forward to reading more on your blog.
Rich Wagner March 24th
Earl,
I agree with you, and the same was true with betas for Bridge. Metadata has simply not been a high priority with Adobe, which is why I’ve also stuck with Photo Mechanic. This blog post by Tyler is a brilliant side-by-side comparison that really does a good job of highlighting the differences in metadata handling between LR and PM – and the deficiencies in LR (and by extension, Bridge). Currently, PM exists because it fills a large void. As a stock photographer, 50% of my “image value” also depends on metadata. Right now, LR and Bridge just don’t cut it.
Bravo, Tyler. Job well done.
Marcos Issa March 24th
Tyler,
Great post, I hope the LR team reads it!
Why not to catch the image date from EXIF, like PM?
David Madison March 24th
Excellent, excellent, excellent! Hopefully Adobe is going to pay attention and start putting some serious effort into this. It just can’t be that hard compared to raw developing.
Also we need much more powerful file renaming capabilities like search and replace, string replacements, etc. All the usual stuff in any free file renaming utility.
Timothy Armes March 26th
My LR/Transporter plugin should solve the last one of your issues.
Find and replace looks like a good feature that I could add too…
ElRobbo March 28th
With respect to the find/change request, I’ve found that you can quickly rename a tag in the Keywords field, and it automatically updates that tag on all the relevant photos without too much of a problem!
In the example of soldiers – just type in ’soldiers’ in the keyword find panel, right-click (yes, I’m a PC user) or hold down the equivalent of the CTRL key when clicking on the keyword (for Mac users) and then just change the keyword using ‘rename’.
It really doesn’t take that long.
Of course, if you just want to change a few of the pics labelled ’soldiers’, and not the others, then a find/change would be useful!
Steve March 29th
Would have to agree with everything you have said here. I absolutely love Photo Mechanic and now that I have it could never function without it. Beyond those points listed, I would say that the one thing Photo Mechanic does best is that it is fast! I can start reviewing and tagging images while images are being ingested. Huge timesaver and indispensable.
entinklat April 5th
Great site this blog.tylerginter.com and I am really pleased to see you have what I am actually looking for here and this this post is exactly what I am interested in. I shall be pleased to become a regular visitor
WJLohmeyer April 5th
Technically, this post is thorough and thoughtful. Hopefully it will be considered for Lightroom 3. As a Marine, I have to chuckle. Is it possible that the image of the flag raising at Iwo Jima would never have seen the light of day if current bureaucratic regulations were in effect?
Jonathan April 8th
What program/system do you all use to search the metadata over a network or through a server? Is there something as stable and less expensive than Canto Cumulus? I think Lightroom 2 can search but it has an image cap, right?
mark April 15th
Very interesting site, Hope it will always be alive!
Joop P April 25th
Very interesting blog, also very curious how you managed to customize the IPTC field names in Photo Mechanic. Can you tell us how to do this.
Would be very grateful
Tyler Ginter April 25th
The field names in Photo Mechanic were customized specifically for the military. You can customize them in Lightroom though if you watch my video tutorial here: http://blog.tylerginter.com/?p=41
James Mulford April 29th
Tyler,
I couldn’t agree with you more and I’ve made similar recommendations to Adobe from the beginning of the LR Beta Program. I also suggest you take a look at FotoStation from http://www.fotoware.com. It already does everything you ask of LR and more, has no size limits and should be adaptable to any large-scale needs you can through at it. Although PM is used by many photographers, Fotostation (at least here in Europe) is the de facto standard of newspapers, agencies and archives. Check it out.
Jitendra Raj Bajracharya October 5th
Thank you. These information are very helpful for learner like me who is trying to build good digital photo archive system here in NEPAL.
Tauppybomfomo November 16th
I could agree in 100%.
He’s the best part if this.
cheers,
______________
Tauppybomfomo
buy colon cleanse
http://confraternitatemplarilivorno.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=3150
Teddy Wade November 22nd
Awesome post Lt. You should articles for magazines or online reviews of media products.
Paul Robinson January 19th
Great post LT Tyler! I would like to address the Marine’s question about the Iwo Jima image, and would it have made it? Decisions on image use are not solely based on metadata, but more on image content. So yes, it would have been selected and published, but if the metadata was missing our staff would have to take time to get it, because later in the image’s life cycle that becomes very important. So the process of having the photographer enter the metadata, and hence the need for great metadata tools, is a force multiplier for the Pentagon staff. Take a look at http://www.defenseimagery.mil, that is where the public can access current military images. If you are military go to https://dams.defenseimagery.mil/ for even more (a CAC is required).
Susan See April 8th
WOW!…and I’m totally speechless. Had no idea about any of this. Thanks so much for enlightening me!
Danny Crasto April 9th
Hi Tyler,
Have become a great fan of yours since I visited you page.
I have a request if you can help me out in this.
I have PM but it doesnt have the field named “People”. In my project workflow its required to add the names of the prominent persons seen in the image. Is there any way by which we can customise PM and add this field in the PM.
Your help in this will be highly appreciated.
Danny
FrancescaRivierra May 16th
One of the factors that can influence the outcome of your program is that many bookmakers set maximum stake limits which can keep you from placing your full wager, so make sure that there in no max limit with any of the bookies that you are dealing with.
The Parlay System is one of the most famous of betting systems that are commonly used in horse racing. Many have said that contrary to other sports betting systems, the Parlay System has a pyramiding effect on your profit which means your winnings are played on successive wagers.
football betting line
So you are based in the United States and worried about your money and current situation, right? If so, there is one thing that you should do right away in order to protect yourself. Close down your account, and switch your funds over to an offshore or overseas service. Not only will this ensure that you are doing everything legally, but you will also be able to keep your money safe. If you are like a lot of players you may have quite a bit of money in your online gambling account. Do you want to lose all of that if something happens? It is better to be safe than sorry in this case.
The problem is, most people wouldn’t know where to begin if they had to devise their own worthwhile Selection System, and those clever enough to be able to do so simply wouldn’t have the time to do it (it is an arduous task). In fact, there are only two groups of people who do bother to spend the time and money to do so properly: (i) Bookies and (ii) sports tipsters. However, while you can be 100% sure that all Bookies operate a good Selection System (but they won’t share it with you), you can be sure that 99% of so-called expert tipsters don’t. The number of tipsters doing a proper job on the Internet can probably be counted on the fingers of just two hands.
Tony June 23rd
Do any of your observations and conclusions change with Lightroom 3?
Add Yours
YOU